"Only one who devotes himself to a cause with his whole strength and soul can be a true master. For this reason mastery demands all of a person."
-Albert Einstein
This blog post may be my opus dei as a martial writer. If there is
one writing I want to survive me once I am gone, I would gladly include this
one.
I will make it as succinct as possible, given the complicated
nature of the question itself.
What is a martial master? What is martial mastery? What defines
the expert from the novice, the advanced practitioner from the noob, the master
from the white belt?
Especially when masters worth honoring would always wear a white
belt again.
The subject matter is one I have contemplated and meditated on for
years. Perhaps when I was thirteen and first awakened to wanting to try in
practicing martial arts, instead of just drifting forward as I had been. Trust
me, there is a marked difference between the motivation of someone who merely
floats, and someone who swims.
This is a question that I have asked for a while. So much that I
have written three different drafts on this very topic before deciding to
ignore the previous writings on the matter and just have at it in an airport in
Canada.
Frankly the question makes me somewhat
nervous, because from what I have found there is no actual general definition
of what a master consists of. It differs from practice to practice, from person
to person. Thus, my definition will potentially and thus invariably be disagreed
with by many who read it. And boy, do I dislike when people hold my views to be
erred. The last time that happened I got over 25,000 views thanks to reddit on a vieo I made on youtube.
But, like going to Israel, like standing up to a gun pointed at me
square on, I am throwing caution to the wind. I might-maybe-could-probably be
wrong, but I Believe in what I am writing, and especially so that
the capitalization was deliberate.
So let me illustrate the disparity of definitions
toward what defines a 'master' concerning martial arts. If there is such a
thing, I honestly ask as a final kind of point to the journey.
A master climber might be the like who scales the unscalable
mountain, or boulders the rock without its crags, but every stone, and
especially mountain is different, and do they stop what they love in climbing
that unbeatable mountain?
No, and a lesser sojourn and path may be what befallen them, no
matter how great they were. But they continue to climb and move, because that
is what makes them love what they do, and therefore what they love to do is
what makes them succeed.
-
|
Daniel-San pay attention or I'll slap you with Koryo. |
To start, there is the view that a
'master' is primarily one who has created their own style. In that sense there
are very few masters in existence, comparative to the multitude who claim the
title. In my opinion, their claim is deserved.
In
Tae Kwon Do a martial arts master was somebody who has reached a specific rank,
usually 4th dan, but I have seen exceptions. I have seen it more generalized
also where a master is anyone who has considerable experience in the art they
practice. This definition is very vague, for example, In WTF style Tae Kwon Do
a person can reach master- ranking after only ten years potentially. I have
been practicing for almost 22 years, and stopped picking up belts after my 5th
first dan, at a time when I also had a 3rd dan in Moo Duk Kwan, and two second
dans, as well as several underbelt rankings in other styles.
Additionally I
have heard one only becomes a master of something after 10,000 hours of
practice. Taking in only the last ten years of practicing, for three hours a
day (my normal amount is between three and five hours a day) I just
bridged 11000 hours.
And yet, even though I do fall under the
definition of master in some elements, I have never, and will ever refer to
myself as one.
This is why I prefer the label Bruce Lee
coined for himself; he was, and would always be a master-student.
And that is a fundamental difference, but
also a somewhat different topic deserving its own musings upon.
To me a master is something that is always
earned, but can be received as either a gift, or by recognition. The former is
when one takes a test and is recognized by their teacher and their school, and
receives an appointment following their successful passing of whatever
conditions are in place to determine a master. The second is when one does not
test, but blossoms on their own independantly into such status. I recall one
teacher who we referred to as Master Arthur, even when he was a third dan. When
I returned to visit the school many years later I was very happy to learn that
this teacher had finally become a fourth dan, because that meant he was
officially recognized by his school and system the title he had already
deserved years before he ever held the dan ranking he does now.
That's just how it is; we all have met
'masters' who did disservice to the name in either ability or their character,
but we also have met a few individuals who it frankly surprised us weren't
masters.
Having been called an expert by others,
and even a master by some, I can understand where Arthur was coming from when
the students he taught referred to him as a master.
Of course we correct people; I am not a
master, and in terms of being officially one with a belt in hand, having been
given by another teacher, will never happen. I am done with belts, and hardly
ever wear one. I received my first black belt when I was seven, and my 3rd dan when
I was 13. Since then I have had numerous black belts from other schools and
styles, been a head instructor to a handful, and run a school myself- to the point I am jaded with the system. I know I am capable in the
arts, I don't need another belt on my rack to prove that fact to anyone other
than myself. And my rack has hung belts from dojos to community colleges. There comes a time you have to hang the rack and take it down.
I have had the fortune of starting a
wonderful club with people devoted to martial arts, and as of this point am
traveling to the middle east not only to teach english, but Martial Arts as
well. Hopefully paired together.
And by no means have I stopped practicing,
I still do for several hours a day (I kind of have to, if I don't my whole body
begins to ache, especially the knees, fingers, and back)
So the journey never ends for me. But when
somebody refers to you as a master, when unaware of your actual ranking,
whether or not you are a master, that is a point to stop and ask yourself how
that title came to be, and whether or not it is deserved in some aspect.
Because to me, a master is someone who is
recognized and honored as such. They are the person others turn to for advice
in terms of martial arts, and it wont always be people from the same style.
They are people who even other masters will speak with respectfully, or as contemporaries, and
they are people who plunge into the arts, and are as much the art as they are
themselves. And when they are a particularly superior kind of teacher and
practitioner, the art they practice is as much affected by them, as they have
been made whom they are by it.
I love martial arts, it gives my life meaning, and that's all someone who practices should humble say.